A management scorecard can be full of accurate numbers and still leave everyone unsure what to do next. Revenue, profit and activity all have their place, but reporting becomes more useful when the measures connect to decisions.
I would start with the questions management needs to answer, then choose the measures. Starting with what the software happens to display reverses that order.
Give each measure a purpose
If cash collection is a concern, debtor days alone may hide a few large overdue or disputed invoices. If margins are weakening, a company-wide percentage may conceal poorly performing contracts that need closer analysis. If delivery capacity is tight, staff numbers will not necessarily reveal the bottleneck.
The scorecard should lead the team towards the cause, not simply show that a number changed.
For each measure, agree its definition, data source, responsible owner and the point at which it needs attention. Otherwise, two departments may discuss the same KPI while calculating it differently.
Keep the core review small enough to use
Five to seven measures can be a sensible starting point for a core management discussion. It is not a universal limit. The right selection depends on the business, and detailed analysis may sit behind those measures.
Ask which decisions the scorecard supported last month. Did it change collection activity, pricing, staffing or the treatment of a difficult contract? A measure that rarely affects a decision may belong in supporting information rather than the main discussion.
At the next monthly meeting: choose one KPI and complete the sentence: “If this moves outside the agreed range, this person will take this action.” If that is difficult, the measure or its ownership needs attention.
Further reading: Making management information more useful.
What does this mean for your organisation?
If this raises a question about your audit, finance support or next business decision, we would be pleased to discuss it.
Ask a question ↗︎